Re: Why Mr Bollen will never be happy

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:52:45 +0100, Steve Firth proclaimed:

> thomas <toooommygin@retardedloony.com> wrote:
>
>> "Mr Benn" <nospam@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:hanm9b$qg4$1@news.eternal-september.org...
>> > And no, I'm not related to Steve Firth.
>> Did I say that or was it brains or filth suggesting I was also Doug
>> that triggered the comment?
>>
>> The comment I made was that it was amazing that dongle or whatever the
>> name was knew about a complaint made by filth to my ISP proving that
>> they might be the same person or at least some collusion   (as was with
>> Doug  when ytou tried to get rid of him as he was spouting the green
>> message and the twats here prefer to threaten and bully rather than
>> engage in discussion with that tiny MAJORITY)
>> Surely you've noticed "new" posters who suddenly jump in to a middle
of
>> an argument supporting the spawn YET seem to know all about the sad
>> diatribes going on for the last few years and IF one starts looking at
>> where themessages come from or the language /swear words/ threats used
>> ..................
>> I pay you the courtesy that you are able to add two and two  together!
>>
>> As regard to the previous posting I was playing up to the
>> assertions/claims that the gruesome twosome regularly make about me -
>> why so unhappy? surely I'm only strengthning your false pictures of me
>> anyway
>
> Is there a translation of this crap available anywhere on the web? I get
> the vague feeling that the retard is accusing me of something, but it's
> difficult to be sure. For a start what "complaint" to Toomy's ISP is he
> whining about? And umm if two people point out that Toomy is a retarded
> lying bag of crap does he really think that means that htey must be the
> same person?
>
> What is "a tiny MAJORITY"? By definition a majority can't be tiny it has
> to be more than 50% of the population or subpopulation.
>
> There seems to be an allegation that I create multiple sock-puppets, a
> claim that Toomy is fond of repeating. He states that if (or IF) one
> looks at where the messages come from that "new posters" and then I get
> a bit lost about where he's heading with that.

I think he means that all the new posters are socks that you have
created. He's unfamiliar with the concept of lurking.I've seen every
poster in ukt on other newsgroups at some time over the last 12 years or
so. There's been extra activing on ukt from the cycling threads and from
Carl Rogers crap recently. I think he's seen new names posting and they
are clearly all you. Obvious innit?

>I take it that it's an
> allegation that all new posters to the group are sock puppets of mine.
>
> That's umm bizarre bullcrap for which Toomy hasn't the slightest schred
> of evidence. Since he can't operate a news reader, hasn't a clue what an
> IP address is and certainly couldn't trace an IP packet to its home even
> if doing so within half a year would save him from being roasted alive
> in a brazen bull as a sacrifice to Baal; his pronouncements on the
> origin of posts are laughable.
>
> His lies about "threats" are even more laughable.

I'm surprised the moron hasn't reported me to my ISP for threatening Mr
Benn and threatening to post pictures of him on the internet.

> And then there's his claim that he's being forced to post crap by forces
> outside of his influence.

I don't understand that one at all.

Mike
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]