• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Who is liable for the damage?

On 28 Oct, 08:11, real-not-anti-spam-addr...@apple-juice.co.uk (D.M.
Procida) wrote:
> NM <nik.mor...@mac.com> wrote:
> > What you all have not taken in to account is that I related the story
> > from the lady and have repeatedly had to ring her since the first
> > posting to get clarification of all the tiny details you lot require.
> > She is now pissed off so I doubt if I will be welcome if I try for
> > even more clarification.
>
> Right. So the readers of this newsgroup have *made you* phone up this
> person repeatedly, because of *their need* for more information, thus
> causing this person to become annoyed with you?

Yes, their desire for every detail needed to be clarified so I phoned,
Why do you find this a problem?

>
> I can see you live in a world where everything that happens is someone
> else's fault.

More extratolation without basis in fact, I was not my accident, small
detail you seem to have overlooked.

>
> Anyway, you're quite right - I doubt a single person reading this has
> taken that into account. Normally when someone asks for advice on
> Usenet, the people responding don't feel they have to make allowances
> for an irritated third party's reluctance to provide more information.

Well I didn't get what I was asking for instead I got an overwhelming
knee jerk reaction from a bunch of rabid loony lycrs louts who turned
over every stone and twisted things this way and that to avoid not
having to blame the cyclist.
Had there been a reasoned normal response then the thread would have
died fairly quickly.

>
> I don't know what you thought you might achieve by starting this
> discussion. I find it hard to believe that you really wanted advice on
> blame or liability, I think you just wanted to start a row.
>
> You got the row, and now you're complaining that it didn't go your way.
> So you're not even very good at trolling.

Well at about 250 posts going since Saturday morning and getting a
bunch of lycra louts hot under the collar I'd say that as a trolling
attempt it was quite good, not one of my better ones but well within
parameters and it didn't start out as a troll but I must admit I have
enjoyed massaging it into one. Thank you for your input BTW.
>
> Daniele

Antworten