Re: Who is liable for the damage?
Von: NM (nik.morgan@mac.com) [Profil]
Datum: 30.10.2009 16:56
Message-ID: <0688b093-6b3d-4bdc-ad9b-02d9ab1eca2e@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: uk.rec.cycling uk.transport
Datum: 30.10.2009 16:56
Message-ID: <0688b093-6b3d-4bdc-ad9b-02d9ab1eca2e@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: uk.rec.cycling uk.transport
On 30 Oct, 15:27, "mileburner" <milebur...@btinternet.com> wrote: > "Adrian" <toomany2...@gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:7l096pF3ad0i7U2@mid.individual.net... > > > NM <nik.mor...@mac.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > > saying: > > >> I have explained it over and over, as if to a particularly dumb child, > >> all the information is there, read, learn and inwardly digest. > >> Repeatedly regurgitating a selection of the facts with your own spin > >> applied just makes you look stupid. > > > Just one question. > > > Which of the many differing versions do we need to read/learn/digest? > > The one which does not make you look stupid :-P I don't know, please advise.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Daniel Barlow (30.10.2009 17:39)
- NM (30.10.2009 21:21)
