Re: Why Mr Bollen will never be happy
Von: Martin (me@privacy.net) [Profil]
Datum: 08.10.2009 10:46
Message-ID: <EJCdnbYeM7aWOlDXnZ2dnUVZ8k2dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
Newsgroup: uk.transport
Datum: 08.10.2009 10:46
Message-ID: <EJCdnbYeM7aWOlDXnZ2dnUVZ8k2dnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
Newsgroup: uk.transport
"Paul - xxx" <notcheckedever@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:7j5gqiF33ki5vU1@mid.individual.net... > Martin wrote: > > Only reason I can think of for riding close to the centre line is to > turn right .. or just to be a cunt. There are no turnings off the road for about a mile, so that only leaves your other suggestion ;-) There was a very long queue of traffic behind these two cyclists, because the road is on a very gentle right hand bend all the way and there wasn't enough visibility of oncoming traffic for anyone to cross the centre line to overtake the right hand cyclist. The only person who got past was a motorcyclist - and he had the narrow width and the accleration to do it safely. Leaving aside pillocks who try to occupy the whole width of their saide fo the road like this, what is the usual advice about cyclists riding two abreast. I know that the HC permits two (but no more than this) abreast, but is any guidance given about when it's not appropriate - eg where it causes an obstruction to other traffic overtaking safely?[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
