Re: More A380 super jumbos for Heathrow
Von: Doug (jagmad@riseup.net) [Profil]
Datum: 05.09.2008 08:45
Message-ID: <e7ea5641-dd1b-4d71-8082-1301d3e371bb@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: uk.transport
Datum: 05.09.2008 08:45
Message-ID: <e7ea5641-dd1b-4d71-8082-1301d3e371bb@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: uk.transport
On 5 Sep, 07:38, Adrian <toomany2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Doug <jag...@riseup.net> gurgled happily, sounding much like they were > saying: > > > This pandering to mass wander lust just keeps on getting worse and wors e > > doesn't it. > > > " Residents will have to get used to more super jumbos filling the sky > > after a reduction in safety limits means more of the giant planes can > > land at Heathrow. > > I'd have thought you'd agree that was a good thing - or do you prefer > Boeing's approach of more flights by smaller planes to get the same > number of people shifted? > No I take the view that ALL non-essential air travel is bad regardless of mode. Also, demand tends to follow supply with hypermobility. > > > The International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAA) has cut back the > > wake separation between the A380 and other aircraft meaning Heathrow > > will be able to handle four landings a day by the world’s largest > > passenger plane. > > Four per day! Wow... > On top of all the other flights teeming in and out of Heathrow? -- UK Radical Campaigns www.zing.icom43.net Travel broadens the damage.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Adrian (05.09.2008 08:56)
- Filthy Sod (05.09.2008 12:19)
- Conor (06.09.2008 14:12)
