Re: Dirty tactics to defend a dirty industry

Brimstone  typed:
> Fod wrote:
>> On Aug 5, 8:18 am, "Brimstone" <brimstone520-n...@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>>> Doug wrote:
>>>> On 5 Aug, 19:57, Conor <conor_tur...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <5232f6bd-2ab3-4226-9b00-9892ec647a53
>>>>> @f63g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>, Doug says...

>>>>>> Duh! Power stations generate electricity and trains and trams
run
>>>>>> on electricity, something that obviously hasn't penetrated yet
to
>>>>>> the self-centred motorists who dominate this transport
newsgroup.
>>>
>>>>> Why are you protesting against something that provides power for a
>>>>> clean form of PT?
>>>
>>>> Because the power source itself is very dirty and does not use
>>>> technology which would make it less dirty.
>>>
>>> What would you use instead?
>>
>> He's stated before that he'd use Gas.
>>
>> IIRC he has dismissed most renewable energy.  Hates biofuels of any
>> kind and won't touch nuclear.
>>
>> Now he's dissing coal gas seems to be his sole choice.
>>
> Errrrrrrrrrrrmmmmmmm, I really do hate to ask this as it might be
> seen as an awkward question, but isn't gas a polluting,  non-rebwable
> fossil fuel that will run out one day?

Would you expect Doug to be able to directly answer a question without him
sticking his foot right in it and destroying any previous argument or
conclusion he may have tenuously arrived at?

Jeez, man, get real.  :)

--
Daul P.

http://www.glass-uk.org/
"You would probably do better not to bother with renewable
energy"  Doug, UK.Transport 29/04/2008 08:53.
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten

Brimstone (05.08.2008 12:43)
John Wright (06.08.2008 18:53)