Re: Gollum will explode in a rage
Von: Mike P (privacy@privacy.net) [Profil]
Datum: 16.07.2008 23:33
Message-ID: <6e77ovF5jup2U1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroup: uk.transport
Datum: 16.07.2008 23:33
Message-ID: <6e77ovF5jup2U1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroup: uk.transport
Doug wrote: > On Jul 16, 7:57 pm, Adrian <toomany2...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Doug <dougbol...@googlemail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like >> they were saying: >> >>> 2p? Yawn. To cover the real cost of motoring petrol would need to >>> cost >>> 2.50 per litre. 2p more or less won't do anything to discourage >>> frivolous hypermobility or ameliorate the external costs imposed by >>> selfish motorists on the rest of society. So you are quite wrong. >>> Even if the government were to increase duty by 2p, I would still >>> think that petrol is scandalously cheap. >> >> Even if the government were to increase duty by £20 per litre, you >> would still think that petrol is scandalously cheap. Mind you, since >> you're an anarchist and therefore against the very concept of >> "government", I don't quite know who you're planning to be in charge >> of setting and collecting the duty on fuel. > >> the duty on fuel. > > Anarchy is not the same as chaos. Social systems of organisation don't > cease to exist simply because there no longer is a monopoly on power. > Under anarchy there would still be a justice system. Under anarchy, > there would be no need for fuel duty, because without a government > pandering to motorists, they would be forced to fully compensate > others for the true cost they impose on them. For example, every time > they pollute a neighbourhood with fumes and noise, the neighbourhood > community would be free charge a toll. The community would be able to > set any price they wish. There would be no government to mandate that > roads must be free at the point of usage. There would be no government > to protect special interests of leeches. > So no government to enforce anything then? Who does? Does this also mean I could get myself a gun, and shoot anyone who tried to "force me to fully compensate"? After all, no govt = no rules. Anarchy would never work. Who is going to decide who's in charge? Who organises these "social systems" then? Democratically elected people? Or just you and your fuckwit friends? Mike P[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
