Re: Planes ?fly empty? to keep slots at Heathrow .
Von: Doug (jagmad@riseup.net) [Profil]
Datum: 17.07.2008 08:14
Message-ID: <18608fbb-704b-4690-bc28-57f8b147367d@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: uk.transport
Datum: 17.07.2008 08:14
Message-ID: <18608fbb-704b-4690-bc28-57f8b147367d@25g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: uk.transport
On 16 Jul, 08:31, NM <nik.mor...@mac.com> wrote: > On 16 jul, 07:53, Doug <jag...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > > > What a criminal waste of energy and cause of unnecessary pollution! > > And they want another runway to make matters worse! > > > "Britain’s third-largest airline, bmi, will fly near-empty aircraft > > from this autumn to preserve multimillion-pound take-off and landing > > slots, The Times has learnt. > > > The rise in fuel prices and an expected slump in passenger numbers > > after the summer mean that many airlines will have to cancel flights, > > but bmi does not want to lose its coveted slots at Heathrow, which are > > valued at £770 million. > > > Airline executives are bracing themselves for their toughest winter > > yet as the credit crunch forces passengers to cut back on air travel > > and fuel prices continue to drive up costs. > > > The decision by bmi to fly “ghost flights” - short-haul trips with > > only a handful of passengers - is one of a series of plans being drawn > > up by airlines. Senior industry figures admit that other carriers will > > cancel domestic flights at short notice and gave warning of chaos > > ahead for business travellers. Rather than withdrawing from uneconomic > > routes, the tactic of cancelling individual flights is another way of > > retaining landing slots..." > > > More: > > >http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/travel/news/article4340518.ece > > > -- > > UK Radical Campaignswww.zing.icom43.net > > Travel broadens the damage. > > Congratulations, second thread this morning without cars being > mentioned by you. I suppose that will come later as the thread > developes. > > Well I'll help you because IMO part of the short haul airlines problem > are the delays imposed by the stringent security policies at airports > has made short haul not significantly longer than driving. Driving is > considerably less stressful and very flexible, even with the increases > in fuel prices for road transport the costs compare, especially with > more than one passenger in the car. I am in Amsterdam at the moment, > Ér indoors and I travelled from Cornwall for less than half the budget > airline fares, as long as this is possible then short haul air > transport will decline. > Well if it a straight choice between flying and driving, preferably in a small car, then driving is probably better but train would be better still. Ultimately though, cutting down on travel is the best option of all. > > But there were significant orders for airliners announced over the > last couple of days so someone is not taking your doom predictions too > seriously. It seems only a few of the companies were ordering and who knows those orders might be cancelled later. -- UK Radical Campaigns www.zing.icom43.net Travel broadens the damage.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
