Re: Does IP telephony suck?
Von: Gordon Henderson (gordon+usenet@drogon.net) [Profil]
Datum: 16.08.2008 22:30
Message-ID: <g87de0$26f$1@energise.enta.net>
Newsgroup: uk.telecom.voip
Datum: 16.08.2008 22:30
Message-ID: <g87de0$26f$1@energise.enta.net>
Newsgroup: uk.telecom.voip
In article <48a72e8f$0$2928$fa0fcedb@news.zen.co.uk>, Klunk <givemespam@wibblywobblyteapot.co.uk> wrote: >Thanks for taking the time to run through that with me Gordon. It's the >first USENET post that I've cut, pasted and saved for a number of years. > >Being ex-BT the bit that bewildered me was this dual fibre thing only >delivering a 2m link when I know we used to knock the same thing down a >couple of pairs of copper. I can't see the benefit in using the fibre in >the first place when you factor in the cost! One of the guys in the place >was saying that they tried to get their DSL down the fibre too and BT >laughed at them, telling them it could not be done. I'm sure that a fibre >link is plenty capable of speed - oddles of it in fact. My best guess is >that there is no 'product' that matches what the company I am working for >wants. BT want to put fibre everywhere, but tehy do have some odd rules - it's probably to do with the competition rules set by Ofcom/whatever. It wouldn't surprise me if they were using less than 1% of the capacity of all the fibre they've laid.... >I get your point about the reliability of VOIP. Clearly there is going to >be a big difference with good hardware, a fibre ISDN 30 and dedicated >equipment. Much more than a DSL line, a PAP2 and a wonky PSU ;-) > >I've got the bug over this whole thing. My interest in telecoms goes way >back and it captivates me. I'm going to have a 'play' with Asterisk. I'm >a Linux bug anyway, so I don't have a steep learning curve. It's going to >come down to basic concepts. I've read that there are hardware issues >with PCI latency, but I don't know how old the article was. Other than >the Box Gordon, what am I going to need to set up a little 'test' >Asterisk system? Say I have 2 X PSTN on the wall + 2 X Sipgate and wanted >to put in 5 extensions. I guess I'm going to need some 'compatible' >phones - hows and what's I am not clear on. I guess I will also need some >form of card to convert the incoming PSTN. How this will all bolt >together, and be 'cheap enough' so that her indoors will let me play - >whilst giving me a useful 'primer' is yet to be seen. Look for trixbox or pbx in a flash. They're mostly "canned" versions of Asterisk + Linux, but might get you going. Failing that, see if your Linux distribution has packages, and if all-else fails, try www.asterisk.org and compile it from source... Hardware wise, look for a TDM400 card with 2 x FXO modules. (You might want to try the OpenVox clone cards as they are cheaper). I use http://www.voipon.co.uk/ for most of this stuff. Stick an FXS module on it too to connect up a local anlogue phone (cheaper than an ATA but you'll not get much change from £220 for the card + 3 modules) (US terminology - FXO's connect to the "Central Office" ie the Telephone Exchange, FXS connect to Stations - ie phones) If you just had one line, then you might find an X100p card (or clone card) on eBay for £20 or less though. I don't think it's good to have 2 of them in a PC though. You won't have PCI latency issues on a relatively new motherboard, but the TDM card prefers to have an IRQ all of it's own. (Although I'm told the newer TDM410 boards are much better in this respect) I haven't done an analogue install for a month or so, so not looked at the newer card yet, but I have an openVox card I'm experimenting with... You might also want to download "the starfish book" and read it - Search for "Asterisk - the future of telephony" - it's in PDF format now. Cheap & basic phones are Grandstream BT200's, but the display is numeric only. They are in the "fisher price" range, but I've deployed quite a few of them with good results. Have fun! Gordon[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- A J Hawke (17.08.2008 10:15)
