Re: Non-geographic numbers: future?

"Roger Mills" <watt.tyler@googlemail.com> wrote in message
news:6bse76F3dbtduU1@mid.individual.net...
> In an earlier contribution to this discussion,
> Zorst <zorst1@googlemail.com>  wrote:
>
> > "Allan Gould" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> > news:6bs2m3F3ct6luU1@mid.individual.net...
> >
> >> Why should I ring a business on an 0800 number ("it's free!!")
from a
> >> landline (when the 0800 cost will be charged to the business, and the
> >> cost presumably passed back to the consumer), when I can ring it for
> >> free in the first place on a geographic number.
> >
> > Not everyone has inclusive minutes to 01/02/03 numbers though.
>
> Maybe, but - unless I'm mistaken - *nobody* has them on 0845 and 0870
> numbers. So no callers will be any worse off if these are replaced by 03
> numbers - and very many will be better off.

I couldn't agree more but I was talking about 0800 numbers.
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]