Re: Freesat query!
Von: DAB sounds worse than FM (dab.is@dead) [Profil]
Datum: 11.08.2008 11:41
Message-ID: <mNTnk.31719$GP7.15864@newsfe23.ams2>
Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv
Datum: 11.08.2008 11:41
Message-ID: <mNTnk.31719$GP7.15864@newsfe23.ams2>
Newsgroup: uk.tech.digital-tv
"The dog from that film you saw" <dsb@removethisbitbtinternet.com> wrote in message news:6g8u51Fer3bhU1@mid.individual.net > "Brian McIlwrath" <bkm@bkmpc.bnsc.rl.ac.uk> wrote in message > news:g7nb8g$1f7$1@south.jnrs.ja.net... >> The dog from that film you saw <dsb@removethisbitbtinternet.com> >> wrote: >> >>> i thought it was the fact that freesat wants the channels to pay >>> rather >> than >>> anything to do with sky? >> >> That's part of it!!! >> >> HOWEVER some Freesat EPG data streams need to get added to each >> transponder >> through data adapter hubs that Sky run. Sky have a limit on new >> services >> they will add each month (even for themselves!) to ensure >> stability - so >> Freesat has a limit to the rate that they can launch channels which >> are >> prepared to pay! >> > > > i do wonder how many freesat boxes have been sold so far - if it's > not > that many it's a bit of a cheek for them to be asked to fork over > 100 > thousand ( i think) to be included on an unproven service for a > year. How long does £100,000 get you included on the Freesat EPG for? And where did you find out how much it costs? -- Steve - www.digitalradiotech.co.uk - Digital Radio News & Info The adoption of DAB was the most incompetent technical decision ever made in the history of UK broadcasting: http://www.digitalradiotech.co.uk/dab/incompetent_adoption_of_dab.htm[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
