Re: Spooky here.

In article <jvo3s6-cjf.ln1@llondel.org>, noone$$@llondel.org says...
> Andrew Marshall wrote:
> 
> > <rant>
> > In much the same vein, the various recent 'controlled services'
> > regulations, such as Part P, and other building rules (new windows and
> > doors being one example) have hooter-all to do with safety or similar
> > concerns, but everything to do with the reduction of unemployment
> > statistics, and, even more importantly, the collection of more income
> > tax, VAT and corporation tax, from the extra business gained by
> > professional[44806] tradesfolk, and from the payments extracted from
> > their enforced customers. Turn a £50 job into a £500 one, and the
> > government coins it big-time.
> > 
> I know people who've done courses for Part P so they can self-certify the

> work they're planning. However, the evil bit is that you have to do work 
to
> keep the certificate current. If I need Part P then I'll do the work myse
lf
> and pay one of the aforementioned people to come and certify it for me.

Part P for

Prescott
Pretentious
Pedantic
Paperwork
Pricey
problems...

--
Paul Carpenter          | paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk
<http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/>    PC Services
<http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/fonts/> Timing Diagram Font
<http://www.gnuh8.org.uk/>  GNU H8 - compiler & Renesas H8/H8S/H8 Tiny
<http://www.badweb.org.uk/> For those web sites you hate
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]