Re: Indicisive pillock
Von: Mark (none@hotmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 20.11.2009 18:04
Message-ID: <4b06cbf4$0$2521$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk>
Newsgroup: uk.rec.driving
Datum: 20.11.2009 18:04
Message-ID: <4b06cbf4$0$2521$da0feed9@news.zen.co.uk>
Newsgroup: uk.rec.driving
"Harry Bloomfield" <harry.m1byt@NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message news:mn.a3e67d9b643f638d.106911@NOSPAM.tiscali.co.uk... > After serious thinking Mike P wrote : >> Why? He / She had given plenty of indication they were a fuckwit. >> Everything you did was incorrect. > > You don't bring a very busy motorway to a crawl without much better > evidence than that. > > -- > Regards, > Harry (M1BYT) (L) > http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk > > PS well done[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Mike P (20.11.2009 18:14)
- Harry Bloomfield (20.11.2009 18:29)
