Re: Rail reopening faces fresh delay
Von: Chris Tolley (cj.tolley@bogus.co.uk) [Profil]
Datum: 06.11.2009 17:35
Message-ID: <5mejazoysn0i.1skpblkzfxvhc$.dlg@40tude.net>
Newsgroup: uk.railway
Datum: 06.11.2009 17:35
Message-ID: <5mejazoysn0i.1skpblkzfxvhc$.dlg@40tude.net>
Newsgroup: uk.railway
Peter Masson wrote: > "Chris Tolley" <cj.tolley@bogus.co.uk (ukonline really)> wrote in message > news:1xgfu5s40e9r9.haudx3d3uu28.dlg@40tude.net... >> Peter Masson wrote: >> >>> "E27002" <e27002@gmail.com> wrote >>> >>>> Welsh Law ceased to exist in the 1540s. >>> >>> There was at least one idiosyncrasy where the law in Wales differed from >>> the >>> law in England until the 1990s. In England until then, if you bought >>> something between dawn and dusk at a recognised market the concept of >>> 'market overt' applied, and you got good title to the item if it >>> subsequently proved to have been stolen. This didn't apply in Wales, and >>> was >>> a source of trick questions for law students. >> >> I remember that from my law studies, which were in the 1980s. Does >> "market overt" not apply any more, then? >> > Abolished for sales from 3 January 1995 by the Sale of Goods (Amendment) Act > 1994. > http://www.artlossreview.com/legal/legalarchive.php?id=1 Thanks. That's my learning done for the day. ;-) -- http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p9683834.html (158 810 at Stalybridge, 26 Feb 2001)[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
