Could level crossings be allowed on a 140 mph route?
Von: Michael Bell (michael@beaverbell.co.uk) [Profil]
Datum: 01.11.2009 21:12
Message-ID: <237089b350.michaelbell@michael.beaverbell.co.uk>
Newsgroup: uk.railway
Datum: 01.11.2009 21:12
Message-ID: <237089b350.michaelbell@michael.beaverbell.co.uk>
Newsgroup: uk.railway
It is well know that HMRI (as it then was) did not allow 140 mph running on the Peterborough - Doncaster section without in-cab signalling. But is that the ONLY objection to 140 mph running on that section? What makes me suck in my breath even more is the number of level crossings. Others might not feel as I do, but what might go wrong on a level crossing is out of the railway's control. Was this ALSO a factor in HMRI's refusal? There are quite a lot of level crossings along this section. A few of them could be removed without replacement because the alternative road route is not very much longer, but most would have to be replaced by a bridge. That might not cost billions, but it would cost millions. (Such speeds would also put the section out of use for local and goods traffic) And surely level crossings would be quite out of the question for 190 mph? Michael Bell --[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Railsigns.co.uk (01.11.2009 21:33)
- John (01.11.2009 21:48)
- Herr Willms (01.11.2009 22:50)
- Peter Masson (01.11.2009 21:48)
- David Hansen (01.11.2009 22:20)
- nimbusjunk@yahoo.co.uk (02.11.2009 20:00)
- Frank t2 (02.11.2009 20:18)
- Neil Williams (03.11.2009 00:20)
- Michael Bell (03.11.2009 06:38)
- John B (03.11.2009 08:07)
- Charlie Hulme (03.11.2009 11:25)
- Graeme (03.11.2009 11:54)
- Bruce (03.11.2009 12:58)
- Andrew Robert Breen (03.11.2009 01:15)
- D7666 (03.11.2009 04:12)
- MIG (03.11.2009 12:05)
- Neil Williams (03.11.2009 12:21)
- Charlie Hulme (03.11.2009 12:34)
- MIG (03.11.2009 12:38)
- David Hansen (03.11.2009 15:45)
