Re: Cheadle Hulme station "refurbishment"
Von: Paul Scott (notvalidpmscott@btinternet.com) [Profil]
Datum: 04.09.2008 20:23
Message-ID: <Z-qdnbsxv5o9ul3VnZ2dnUVZ8v6dnZ2d@bt.com>
Newsgroup: uk.railway
Datum: 04.09.2008 20:23
Message-ID: <Z-qdnbsxv5o9ul3VnZ2dnUVZ8v6dnZ2d@bt.com>
Newsgroup: uk.railway
"Jeremy Double" <jmd.nospam@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:D-ydndbWBItghV3VnZ2dnUVZ8s3inZ2d@bt.com... > Graeme Wall wrote: >> In message <xomdnXEM5fm7WCLVnZ2dnUVZ8vOdnZ2d@bt.com> >> Ramps take up a lot more space that may not be available. Lifts are >> relatively cheap to install and run. > > There is plenty of space for ramps at Shipley. In fact one of the > platforms where they're working is already served by a passenger underpass > accessed by ramps (although the underpass has been known on occasion to > flood after heavy rain). In this case they would do better to sort out > the drainage and refurbish the underpass rather than spend lots of money > on new lifts There must be a rule about ramp gradients - Rugby has fairly easy ramps to the island platform yet is still getting a lift too... Paul[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Poster (04.09.2008 20:54)
- Charlie Hulme (04.09.2008 22:48)
