nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: Cheadle Hulme station "refurbishment"

Von: Paul Scott (notvalidpmscott@btinternet.com) [Profil]
Datum: 04.09.2008 20:23
Message-ID: <Z-qdnbsxv5o9ul3VnZ2dnUVZ8v6dnZ2d@bt.com>
Newsgroup: uk.railway
"Jeremy Double" <jmd.nospam@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:D-ydndbWBItghV3VnZ2dnUVZ8s3inZ2d@bt.com...
> Graeme Wall wrote:
>> In message <xomdnXEM5fm7WCLVnZ2dnUVZ8vOdnZ2d@bt.com>

>> Ramps take up a lot more space that may not be available.  Lifts are
>> relatively cheap to install and run.
>
> There is plenty of space for ramps at Shipley.  In fact one of the
> platforms where they're working is already served by a passenger underpass
> accessed by ramps (although the underpass has been known on occasion to
> flood after heavy rain).  In this case they would do better to sort out
> the drainage and refurbish the underpass rather than spend lots of money
> on new lifts

There must be a rule about ramp gradients - Rugby has fairly easy ramps to
the island platform yet is still getting a lift too...

Paul



[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten