Re: Calder valley services from 14/12/2008
Von: strowger@ls12.net [Profil]
Datum: 23.05.2008 15:13
Message-ID: <4836c316$0$26088$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>
Newsgroup: uk.railway
Datum: 23.05.2008 15:13
Message-ID: <4836c316$0$26088$db0fefd9@news.zen.co.uk>
Newsgroup: uk.railway
Paul Rigg <g0tvb@hotmail.com> wrote: > According to West Yorkshire PTA Northern have proposed the following > alterations from the December 2008 > 1 Leeds-Manchester service calling at all stations (actually starting at > Selby) > 1 limited stop service calliing only at Halifax Hebden Bridge Todmorden > Rochdale and Manchester Victoria (between Bradford In and Man Vic). This > will give a journey time between Bradford and Manchester in under an hour. > 1 York/Leeds-Blackpool North Service stops generally as now but some > additional peak hour stops at Sowerby Bridge Didn't this used to stop at Sowerby Bridge (sometimes) anyway? Perhaps back when it was TPX's Blackpool-Scarborough? > 1 Leeds=Bradford-Brighouse-Huddersfield-Wakefield generally as now > 1 Leeds to Manchester Vic via Dewsbury hourly from 0600 to 1900 (all > stations except Ravensthorpe) > Not sure about calling pattern between Rochdale and Manchester (that being > outside WYPTA's area) from the Metro doc: "Moston, Mills Hill, Castleton, Rochdale, Smithy Bridge, Littleborough, Walsden (one peak train only) and Todmorden will gain an hourly service to and from Leeds via Brighouse, Dewsbury and other intermediate stations. Stations between Morley and Brighouse (excluding Ravensthorpe) will gain an hourly link to and from Todmorden, Rochdale and Manchester Victoria and intermediate stations in Greater Manchester" so that's all-stations? > Looks good for most stations on the ;line, however there will be service > reductions at Mytholmroyd (2tph instead of 3), Sowerby Bridge (off peak) > and Walsden (peak) Very interesting - thank you for posting this. Assume your source is http://www.wypta.gov.uk/NR/rdonlyres/47213667-2BE0-4ED1-82D1-0E319B982594/0/RWG16MAY2008IT EM5.pdf ? My fag-packet calculation says this is going to need more diagrams - is there more stock or is it a case of dividing up some of the current 2*155 or 155+153 combinations to do it?[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Mark Morton (23.05.2008 18:55)
