Re: OT: 'Shambolic' Sellafield in crisis again after damning safety report - Independent on Sunday
Von: Hans-Joachim Zierke (usenetspam012@zierke.com) [Profil]
Datum: 08.02.2008 20:36
Message-ID: <slrnfqpbq6.2m2.Usenetspam012@Odysseus.Zierke.com>
Newsgroup: uk.railway
Datum: 08.02.2008 20:36
Message-ID: <slrnfqpbq6.2m2.Usenetspam012@Odysseus.Zierke.com>
Newsgroup: uk.railway
David Hansen schrieb: > The problems were due to inadequate quality control. They would have > happened had the turbines been mounted on land, though the sea no > doubt made the problems appear more rapidly. Fixing something at sea > is rather more difficult than on the land, which makes it imperative > to get it right first time. Otherwise removing every nacelle and > fixing it on land may be the only option, which was done at Horns > Rev. > > Vestas must have lost a fair amount of money on the whole thing, not > just on that scheme but in lost orders for other projects. In Germany, some people laughed, when Enercon installed its first "offshore" 5 MW turbine some 200 feet on the water side. Perhaps it wasn't the worst of ideas. Hans-Joachim -- House of the Rising Sun http://foto.arcor-online.net/palb/alben/08/860608/1024_3537396266316230.jpg[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- 826 (08.02.2008 23:10)
- David Hansen (09.02.2008 11:13)
- Hans-Joachim Zierke (09.02.2008 23:55)
- Hans-Joachim Zierke (10.02.2008 21:14)
