Re: It has been frequently said on here that...

In message <ee5eg5p5k5jme3e7fbu0jdd85p73bq5a60@4ax.com>, Spike
<Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> writes
>
>Brian Reay wrote:
>
>> "Spike" <Aero.Spike@S&T.invalid> wrote in message
>>news:7budg5hlcnq3ds2rf9e2vqb07thfboeg5v@4ax.com...
>> >
>>> How much worse could it be?
>>
>>If that is all true, not much.
>>
>>Now we get to what should be done. I'd remove such a person's licence for
>>good and  ban them from any public office.
>
>I doubt she'd get through a CRB/VBA/ISA check, so when she goes back
>to barristering she'll have to stay away from cases involving children
>and vulnerable adults. Funny how one of her laws has come back to bite
>her.
>

Do you get a 'pass/fail' with a CRB etc? I thought that these checks
simply come up with a list of transgressions - and possibly a few
'secret comments' if the local police thought that you looked like a
villain, but didn't actually have anything on you.

I would have thought that a few relatively minor motoring offences would
have absolutely no bearing on your suitability for being involved with
legal cases involving children. That sort of thing would only happen in
a police state.
--
Ian

[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten

Walt Davidson (21.11.2009 03:08)

Spike (21.11.2009 10:17)