• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: RSGB makes it to El Reg

michaelM wrote:
> Ian Jackson wrote:
>> In message <VsOdnTAoP7FS9nbXnZ2dnUVZ8sudnZ2d@eclipse.net.uk>, michaelM
>> <mikey@somewhare.com> writes
>>>
>>
>>> The only point I am trying to make is that presently the rules are
>>> that newcomers have to become either an M3 or M6 as first real
>>> legitimate step. Therefore it is wrong for people to denigrate M3/M6
>>> callsigns on that basis alone.
>>
>> No. There is no requirement for anyone to actually become an M3/M6 (or
>> even a 2E). You only have to pa$$ the exam$. Pa$$ the F£, I£ and
the
>> 'Advanced' exam$, and you can get a Full Licence.
>
>
> Whilst this theoretical "martyrdom" might be possible, do you know
> anyone that has elected to do this?
>
> To be honest, I think that any such "martyr", is a bit of an idiot for
> deliberately inhibiting proper practice for the sakes of a puerile cause.
>
> I think each of you that has mentioned this "loophole" in the M3/6 saga
> knows full well what was meant, and what is still meant; i.e. that
> newcomers have to do this M3/6 thing to get on 1st rung of the
> proverbial ladder.

Well, there are posters on this group who claim to have taken the old
RAE and not applied for a licence until after taking the Morse exam.

Additionally, there will be people who have taken all 3 exams at the HF
convention and, even at the most impatient level, will have gone
straight to 2E or even M0.

Antworten