Re: Lawful Behaviour Can Make You Liable To Arrest - Very Important For Radio Amateurs
Von: Spike (aero.spike@s&t.invalid) [Profil]
Datum: 30.10.2009 14:34
Message-ID: <2gqle551jo7es2tmv0cacj6gd5nh3m9f48@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Datum: 30.10.2009 14:34
Message-ID: <2gqle551jo7es2tmv0cacj6gd5nh3m9f48@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
lucifer@eternal-flames.gov wrote: >On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:43:14 +0000, Ian Jackson ><ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> wrote: > >>I presume you've been following the thread in uk.legal about the guy >>photographing the water skiers. > >I've just looked at that thread and the circumstances are not as >straightforward as in Spike's original posting. Seems clear enough... >Was person B, in fact the landowner or agent of the landowner? "Garry had stopped in a lay-by after seeing a picture opportunity at Glyn Neath Lakes - a watersports centre adjacent to the A465 in South Wales." He said he had been taking photos from a public area for 'ten minutes' when a man claiming to be the lake's landowner approached. Person B was the landowner of the lakes, not the lay-by. >A landowner can legally ask you to stop doing anything, whilst you are >on his land. That includes taking a camera, or any other item onto his >land and/or using same whilst on his land. > >If person B was not the landowner, but just an average MoP, was he >asking person A to stop doing something which a clearly displayed sign >or notice, already required people not to do. In which case person A >is in the wrong. There are few notices restricting photography in or from a public place, and no mention of them here. Even the police couldn't find anything wrong with the act of photography; the bludgeon used to stop it was the 'inflammatory act' of a so-called Public Order offence. I wished to draw to the attention of Radio Amateurs, who - let's face it - are a strange-looking bunch doing even stranger things in public, just ripe for a POA offence. -- from Aero Spike Not a member of the RSGB for 50 years 1959 - 2009[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
