Re: Another Airbus down ....
Von: Yeti (yeti@ayrshore.com) [Profil]
Datum: 01.07.2009 20:58
Message-ID: <h2gbk3$cr8$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Datum: 01.07.2009 20:58
Message-ID: <h2gbk3$cr8$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Brian Reay wrote: > "Brian Morrison" <bdm@fenrir.org.uk> wrote in message > news:20090701093949.3fe70761@peterson.fenrir.org.uk... >> On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 06:49:41 +0100 >> "Brian Reay" <seewebsite@invalid.com> wrote: >> >>> "Brian Morrison" <bdm@fenrir.org.uk> wrote in message >>> news:20090701001000.475fd295@peterson.fenrir.org.uk... >>>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:56:17 +0100 >>>> Dave <davenpat@btopenworld.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Brian Morrison wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:22:34 +0100 >>>>>> Walt Davidson <g3nyy@invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> overran the runway after aborting the takeoff well above rotation >>>>>>> speed. >>>>>> That's what V1 is for, any problem at or above that speed and you >>>>>> take >>>>>> the problem into the air. >>>>> So what is V2 about then? >>>> Minimum safe speed after rotation to maintain a positive climb rate, >>>> see here: >>>> >>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_speeds >>>> >>> V1 relates to "stopping distance", not ability to "fly". >>> >>> Read your own reference. >> Er, where did I say that V1 related to flying? > > Think about it. You get to V1, so don't have the runway to stop but can't > make V2, you are not going to be flying anywhere. > I agree that, once pass V1 and V2 you would take off but only if you make > V2. In essence V1 is the last point were is it safe to abort intentionally. > If you go through V1 and don't make V2, you will end up in the gravel at the > end of the runway. The choice is to do so while rolling and braking or, if > you have managed to "get off" but not maintain flight, "drop in". > > -- > 73 > Brian G8OSN/W8OSN > www.g8osn.org.uk > > > > > > You've misunderstood the point - once you've made it to V1 - you take off, no matter what. Unless you reach Vr, and it fails to rotate... in which case the technical term is "f***ed".[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Barry Moore (01.07.2009 21:09)
