• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Yes or no?

In message <h2qou4$2s3$2@news.eternal-september.org>, Yeti
<yeti@ayrshore.com> writes
>Steve Terry wrote:
>> "Yeti" <yeti@ayrshore.com> wrote in message
>>news:h2qn68$g61$4@news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Steve Terry wrote:
>>>
>>>> Whereas a CBer can be a operator using unmodified radios
>>>>  for local use as they were designed for.
>>> If they were designed for local use, they shouldn't have been on HF!
>>>
>>> The Government here managed to screw up twice in one go - 27MHz was
>>>too  low to be 'local' and 934MHz was too high to work (almost
>>>anywhere!).
>>>
>>>
>> Phillips and other manufactures supported around 225 to 240 MHz FM
>>  That's where CB should have been, but the MOD didn't want to give up
>> the smallest amount of what they saw as UHF airband
>>  Steve Terry
>I agree.
>
>220MHz would have been ideal.
>
>High enough to give 25kHz channels, with little interference (RX or
>TX), and low enough for the radios not to cost a fortune.

Too close to DAB radio. I wonder if they foresaw it coming?
--
Ian

Antworten