nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: Yes or no?

Von: Yeti (yeti@ayrshore.com) [Profil]
Datum: 05.07.2009 19:46
Message-ID: <h2qou4$2s3$2@news.eternal-september.org>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Steve Terry wrote:
> "Yeti" <yeti@ayrshore.com> wrote in message
> news:h2qn68$g61$4@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Steve Terry wrote:
>>
>>> Whereas a CBer can be a operator using unmodified radios
>>>  for local use as they were designed for.
>> If they were designed for local use, they shouldn't have been on HF!
>>
>> The Government here managed to screw up twice in one go - 27MHz was too
>> low to be 'local' and 934MHz was too high to work (almost anywhere!).
>>
>>
> Phillips and other manufactures supported around 225 to 240 MHz FM
>
> That's where CB should have been, but the MOD didn't want to give up
> the smallest amount of what they saw as UHF airband
>
> Steve Terry
>
>
I agree.

220MHz would have been ideal.

High enough to give 25kHz channels, with little interference (RX or TX),
and low enough for the radios not to cost a fortune.

[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten