Re: Yes or no?
Von: Yeti (yeti@ayrshore.com) [Profil]
Datum: 06.07.2009 00:42
Message-ID: <h2ra8q$b1d$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Datum: 06.07.2009 00:42
Message-ID: <h2ra8q$b1d$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Steve Terry wrote: > "Ian Jackson" <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> wrote in message > news:Vt+VY5Cb6OUKFwT3@g3ohx.demon.co.uk... >> In message <h2qou4$2s3$2@news.eternal-september.org>, Yeti >> <yeti@ayrshore.com> writes >>> Steve Terry wrote: >>>> "Yeti" <yeti@ayrshore.com> wrote in message >>>> news:h2qn68$g61$4@news.eternal-september.org... >>>>> Steve Terry wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Whereas a CBer can be a operator using unmodified radios >>>>>> for local use as they were designed for. >>>>> If they were designed for local use, they shouldn't have been on HF! >>>>> >>>>> The Government here managed to screw up twice in one go - 27MHz was too >>>>> low to be 'local' and 934MHz was too high to work (almost anywhere!). >>>>> >>>> Phillips and other manufactures supported around 225 to 240 MHz FM >>>> That's where CB should have been, but the MOD didn't want to give up >>>> the smallest amount of what they saw as UHF airband >>>> Steve Terry >>>> >>> I agree. >>> 220MHz would have been ideal. >>> High enough to give 25kHz channels, with little interference (RX or TX), >>> and low enough for the radios not to cost a fortune. >> Too close to DAB radio. I wonder if they foresaw it coming? >> Ian >> >> > Band 3, 175MHz to 225 was allocated to PBR trunking radio, that's why > above 225 was looked at, the biggest fear was possible freebanding > of 225 to 235MHz interference on to 243MHz UHF AM distress. > > The obvious place now for a new CB service would be to simply > adopt US UHF 462/7MHz GMRS, which was originally US class A CB. > > GMRS also has provision for 5MHz split repeaters, so public UHF > repeaters as they have in OZ on 477MHz could be possible on 462/7 > > Steve Terry > > VHF and UHF is now far too much in hard cash to ever be given over to any CB or Amateur use - they're already stealing 70cms for taxis in London... 27MHz is worth nothing - noone will have it. The same £75 a year VHF PMR licence I hold in Ayrshire would cost me £1500 a year if I was in Central London! That's just for 2 12.5kHz channels, so you can see how much they'd lose.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Ian Jackson (06.07.2009 09:34)
- Conor (06.07.2009 12:35)
- Walt Davidson (06.07.2009 13:43)
- Joanna (06.07.2009 16:51)
- Poster (06.07.2009 17:41)
- Joanna (06.07.2009 17:45)
- Jim GM4DHJ/M (06.07.2009 20:29)
- Yeti (06.07.2009 20:53)
