nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: Yes or no?

Von: Yeti (yeti@ayrshore.com) [Profil]
Datum: 06.07.2009 00:42
Message-ID: <h2ra8q$b1d$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Steve Terry wrote:
> "Ian Jackson" <ianREMOVETHISjackson@g3ohx.demon.co.uk> wrote in
message
> news:Vt+VY5Cb6OUKFwT3@g3ohx.demon.co.uk...
>> In message <h2qou4$2s3$2@news.eternal-september.org>, Yeti
>> <yeti@ayrshore.com> writes
>>> Steve Terry wrote:
>>>> "Yeti" <yeti@ayrshore.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:h2qn68$g61$4@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>> Steve Terry wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Whereas a CBer can be a operator using unmodified radios
>>>>>>  for local use as they were designed for.
>>>>> If they were designed for local use, they shouldn't have been on
HF!
>>>>>
>>>>> The Government here managed to screw up twice in one go - 27MHz was
too
>>>>> low to be 'local' and 934MHz was too high to work (almost
anywhere!).
>>>>>
>>>> Phillips and other manufactures supported around 225 to 240 MHz FM
>>>>  That's where CB should have been, but the MOD didn't want to give up
>>>> the smallest amount of what they saw as UHF airband
>>>>  Steve Terry
>>>>
>>> I agree.
>>> 220MHz would have been ideal.
>>> High enough to give 25kHz channels, with little interference (RX or TX),
>>> and low enough for the radios not to cost a fortune.
>> Too close to DAB radio. I wonder if they foresaw it coming?
>> Ian
>>
>>
> Band 3, 175MHz to 225 was allocated to PBR trunking radio, that's why
> above 225 was looked at, the biggest fear was possible freebanding
> of 225 to 235MHz  interference on to 243MHz UHF AM distress.
>
> The obvious place now for a new CB service would be to simply
> adopt US UHF 462/7MHz GMRS, which was originally US class A CB.
>
> GMRS also has provision for 5MHz split repeaters, so public UHF
> repeaters as they have in OZ on 477MHz could be possible on 462/7
>
> Steve Terry
>
>

VHF and UHF is now far too much in hard cash to ever be given over to
any CB or Amateur use - they're already stealing 70cms for taxis in
London...

27MHz is worth nothing - noone will have it.

The same £75 a year VHF PMR licence I hold in Ayrshire would cost me
£1500 a year if I was in Central London! That's just for 2 12.5kHz
channels, so you can see how much they'd lose.

[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten