Re: Another Airbus down ....
Von: nntp@benison.co.uk [Profil]
Datum: 01.07.2009 21:46
Message-ID: <voen455t5f3e1ig62fbkbia2ep62sfiv10@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Datum: 01.07.2009 21:46
Message-ID: <voen455t5f3e1ig62fbkbia2ep62sfiv10@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 20:34:16 +0100, "Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote: >V1 is no guarantee of reaching V2, even in a multi with a problem. V1 is calculated and defined such that this statement is not true. Many 4 engined jets are engineered that they can climb on two. One military 4 engine in current service can do this on one engine. All three engine jets can do so on two. >Reminds me of the great "motion without power" debate, eh Spike? Confabulation to use your term. A multi-engine environment is what is under discussion. In the single engine case V1 = V2 = Vr[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
