Re: Yes or no?
Von: Steve Terry (gfourwwk@tesco.net) [Profil]
Datum: 05.07.2009 19:40
Message-ID: <h2qohu$tou$1@news.albasani.net>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Datum: 05.07.2009 19:40
Message-ID: <h2qohu$tou$1@news.albasani.net>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
"Yeti" <yeti@ayrshore.com> wrote in message news:h2qn68$g61$4@news.eternal-september.org... > Steve Terry wrote: > >> Whereas a CBer can be a operator using unmodified radios >> for local use as they were designed for. > > If they were designed for local use, they shouldn't have been on HF! > > The Government here managed to screw up twice in one go - 27MHz was too > low to be 'local' and 934MHz was too high to work (almost anywhere!). > > Phillips and other manufactures supported around 225 to 240 MHz FM That's where CB should have been, but the MOD didn't want to give up the smallest amount of what they saw as UHF airband Steve Terry[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Yeti (05.07.2009 19:46)
- Ian Jackson (05.07.2009 20:19)
- Joanna (06.07.2009 00:19)
- Yeti (06.07.2009 00:42)
- Ian Jackson (06.07.2009 09:34)
- Conor (06.07.2009 12:35)
- Walt Davidson (06.07.2009 13:43)
- Joanna (06.07.2009 16:51)
- Poster (06.07.2009 17:41)
- Joanna (06.07.2009 17:45)
- GM4DHJ ... (06.07.2009 20:29)
- Yeti (06.07.2009 20:53)
