nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: another plane crash ...

Von: Dave (davenpat@btopenworld.com) [Profil]
Datum: 04.07.2009 01:11
Message-ID: <IrKdnfJrUuOqDdPXnZ2dnUVZ8n9i4p2d@bt.com>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Steve Terry wrote:
> "Dave" <davenpat@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> news:nJOdnZ42IcWP6NPXnZ2dnUVZ8h2dnZ2d@bt.com...
>> Brian Morrison wrote:
>>> nntp@benison.co.uk wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:38:23 +0100, Brian Morrison
>>>> <scrapspam@fenrir.org.uk>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> You can't hit a radar you can't see, and terrain masking
>>>>> works both ways.
>>>> The idea is to fix the target at altitude and then come in fast and
low.
>>>> Then climb,  firing your anti radar missile and dive back down for
cover
>>>> and
>>>> fly out at low level.
>>> I thought the advantage of ALARM was that you can fire it and then
>>> leaving it hanging on its parachute until something excites it enough to
>>> detach and rocket down on its target.
>>>
>> To the best of my knowledge ALARM was never fitted to an F3
>> Dave
>>
>>
> I don't think there would be room for them and their system,
> unless you removed their nice new AIM-120 AMRAAM's

Agreed. Though the F3 centre fuse and wings look much like the GR1 /
GR4's, they are quite different internally. And like you, I could not
imagine where they would put the ALARM black boxes.

Dave

[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten