Re: another plane crash ...
Von: Dave (davenpat@btopenworld.com) [Profil]
Datum: 04.07.2009 01:11
Message-ID: <IrKdnfJrUuOqDdPXnZ2dnUVZ8n9i4p2d@bt.com>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Datum: 04.07.2009 01:11
Message-ID: <IrKdnfJrUuOqDdPXnZ2dnUVZ8n9i4p2d@bt.com>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Steve Terry wrote: > "Dave" <davenpat@btopenworld.com> wrote in message > news:nJOdnZ42IcWP6NPXnZ2dnUVZ8h2dnZ2d@bt.com... >> Brian Morrison wrote: >>> nntp@benison.co.uk wrote: >>>> On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 09:38:23 +0100, Brian Morrison >>>> <scrapspam@fenrir.org.uk> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> You can't hit a radar you can't see, and terrain masking >>>>> works both ways. >>>> The idea is to fix the target at altitude and then come in fast and low. >>>> Then climb, firing your anti radar missile and dive back down for cover >>>> and >>>> fly out at low level. >>> I thought the advantage of ALARM was that you can fire it and then >>> leaving it hanging on its parachute until something excites it enough to >>> detach and rocket down on its target. >>> >> To the best of my knowledge ALARM was never fitted to an F3 >> Dave >> >> > I don't think there would be room for them and their system, > unless you removed their nice new AIM-120 AMRAAM's Agreed. Though the F3 centre fuse and wings look much like the GR1 / GR4's, they are quite different internally. And like you, I could not imagine where they would put the ALARM black boxes. Dave[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Brian Morrison (04.07.2009 15:51)
- Dave (04.07.2009 18:14)
- Walt Davidson (04.07.2009 19:45)
- Dave (04.07.2009 22:52)
