Re: Is this group about amateur radio in the UK?
Von: Steve Terry (gfourwwk@tesco.net) [Profil]
Datum: 04.07.2009 11:19
Message-ID: <h2n6rp$8oj$1@news.albasani.net>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Datum: 04.07.2009 11:19
Message-ID: <h2n6rp$8oj$1@news.albasani.net>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
"Brian Reay" <see@website.invalid> wrote in message news:WuD3m.11571$ME1.10251@newsfe05.ams2... > "The Brains of the Outfit..." <Trabant Owners Club@nicksplace.co.com> > wrote in message news:iPw3m.51219$OO7.12536@text.news.virginmedia.com... >> "Mr Benn" <%%%@%.%%> wrote in message >> news:bJOdne2zgspeVtDXnZ2dnUVZ8kudnZ2d@pipex.net... >>> I got my class A licence when I was 15 so I'm not exactly ancient. >> >> In which case, you should be well aware, that when you have a QSO, your >> conversation is not restricted solely to Amateur Radio matters. >> Therefore, why on earth do you feel, this forum is any different?. >> >> Having subscribed to this forum for more years than I care to remember, I >> can safely say, at least half the postings are not directly connected to >> AR issues. IMHO, if every topic was strictly related to AR, this NG, >> would have folded at least seven years ago... > > I don't think that is true. I think the contributor list would be very > different, which would remove much of the abuse, but I don't think it > would fold. (If you check those who tend to hurl the abuse you will find > they rarely, if ever, offer a worthwhile input on the topics related to > amateur radio.) I can think of several other groups which are doing rather > well, simply because the troublemakers are kept out. People don't always > agree in those groups and sometimes can't even agree to differ but they > don't hurl abuse. > 73 > Brian G8OSN/W8OSN > > But Brian you are the living embodiment that this NG isn't only about Amateur radio, and in your case not even for Radio Amateurs Steve Terry[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
