Re: another plane crash ...
Von: Yeti (yeti@ayrshore.com) [Profil]
Datum: 04.07.2009 22:56
Message-ID: <h2oflt$5re$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Datum: 04.07.2009 22:56
Message-ID: <h2oflt$5re$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Dave wrote: > Yeti wrote: >> Dave wrote: >>> Brian Morrison wrote: >>>> On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:12:44 +0100 >>>> Dave <davenpat@btopenworld.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> nntp@benison.co.uk wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:56:03 +0100, Brian Morrison >>>>>> <scrapspam@fenrir.org.uk> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Which has been known to work against them, even in a Tornado GR1. >>>>>> Or should that be especially in a GR1. Never played with the GR4 >>>>>> though! >>>>> GR4's were limmited to subsonic speeds after MLU. >>>> >>>> Er, why? >>>> >>> The reason that a Tornado could reach Mach 2 was down to the variable >>> geometry ramps at the front of the intakes. At speed, the ramps would >>> come down from the top of the intake to prevent (I can't remember the >>> terminology). >>> >>> >>> I have remembered now, it is the shock wave of the air from going too >>> far down the intake. >>> >>> Basically it was to prevent too much air punching down towards the >>> engines and blowing out the flame. There used to be an AICS (air >>> intake control system) that controlled the angle of the ramp >>> according to the A/C air speed. There is a vent about 2 or 3 foot >>> behing the front of the intake on top. This was there to balance the >>> pito static system that the computers used. >>> >>> At the sides of the intake were spring loaded inlet vents that >>> allowed extra air to go into the intakes. >>> >>> The above is a very scant description of how it worked >>> >>> Before MLU the RAF decided that they didn't need supersonic flight >>> from the GR1's and it was decided to take out all of the AICS >>> systems. This left space for other things to go into the avionic bays >>> for GR4 enhancement. >>> >>> The ramps were controled by a hydraulic actuator and they were >>> removed and replaced by an adjustable strut that was set once only. >>> >>> F3's were not affected. >>> >>> HTH >>> >>> Dave >> >> So, in fact, from what you're saying, the GR4s aren't actually capable >> of supersonic flight, because without the variable ramps (as found on >> Concorde, and the Tu144), the engines wouldn't stay running once the >> air entering the intake became supersonic. > > I don't know the technicalites, but I would assume so. But that could > only happen if the aircraft went into a steep dive. In level flight, I > should imagine that the speed would be self leveling. > > I can only assume that the shock wave would be at the wrong part of the > intake and blow out the candles. Once again, this is not my specialist > area. Rolls Royce and MBB controled this area. > > Dave I still regard SNECMA as the authority on Variable Intake Ramps... but I always was a huge fan on Concorde, and even it's Russian 'sibling'.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
