• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Embra....

Brian Morrison wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 18:39:39 +0000 (UTC)
> Custos Custodum <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>
>> Walt Davidson <g3nyy@invalid.invalid> wrote in
>> news:ns6v45p3p111okr9g6bbt4gevr00ej5cbt@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 18:11:24 +0000 (UTC), Custos Custodum
>>> <me@privacy.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's under the sea bed, actually, which means that it is covered by
>>>> entirely different international treaties. Most of the oilfields would
>>>> fall under the jurisdiction of an independent Scotland.
>>> But Scotland is not independent.
>>>
>>> 73 de Wlat
>>>
>> Indeed, which is why it is nonsense for all the 'Little Englanders' to
>> speak of 'subsidising' Scotland. They can't have it both ways.
>
> But the basis of the union was that Scotland would have its debts
> cleared, have extra money from the Treasury and be over-represented in
> the UK parliament. Scotland had it it's own way for 300 years, and it's
> time that things were put back to a more sensible basis. It isn't the
> 18th century any more.
>
What makes you think that Scotland is over-represented?

Antworten