Re: D-STAR simplex node?
Von: Ben (nospam@nospam.com) [Profil]
Datum: 05.07.2008 20:07
Message-ID: <CpCdnVoAkZX1JfLVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@posted.plusnet>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
Datum: 05.07.2008 20:07
Message-ID: <CpCdnVoAkZX1JfLVnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@posted.plusnet>
Newsgroup: uk.radio.amateur
RT wrote: > > >> How come all the D-STAR nodes are repeaters and there are no simplex >> nodes? > > <snip> > > > Why not ask on the DStar-UK forum ? Turns out the question has already been asked there, with only one reply basically stating "Yes, I'd like to do that too". > Simplex nodes are all very well, but they are very inefficient. Too many > times a low powered user on a hand held has been transmitted over by a > base station further away who could only hear the link and not the low > powered user and thought the link wasn't in use, asking if the frequency > is clear doesn't always work in the case of simplex nodes. Good point, but I think that scenario is less relevant here than in many places as the coverage area is small with a sharp cutoff due to local terrain (everyone within coverage should be able to hear everyone else), and the population within the coverage area is low. > BTW, DStar isn't Echolink or IRLP. Nobody said it was, although my references to Echolink do seem to confuse people. I merely mention it to illustrate the concept of a cheap and simple link that anyone can set up, as opposed to the greater investment of time and effort (and money) that goes into setting up a repeater.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
