Norman The Conqueror Defends the Flying Vet
Von: Charles Douglas Wehner (charleswehner@hotmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 16.10.2009 18:52
Message-ID: <a03630c3-7fa0-472a-a8fb-511040ffbd6e@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: uk.politics.censorship
Datum: 16.10.2009 18:52
Message-ID: <a03630c3-7fa0-472a-a8fb-511040ffbd6e@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: uk.politics.censorship
The "Norman Conquest" took place on 22nd July 1999, when Norman Scarth conquered Britain at the European Court of Human Rights: http://www.ukmm.org.uk/camp/hr/scarth.htm Of course, the British authorities would not leave it at that. They invented all manner of trumped-up charges against him as REVENGE for his triumph. They even put him in prison, and then into a mental home - trying to prove him mad. If he is mad, then so is the entire European Court of Human Rights. Their "madness" was to insist that legal hearings cannot be heard in SECRET, as this violates Article 6 of the Convention on Human Rights. It did not discourage the crooked British authorities, however. Today, they hold MORE hearings in secret than ever before. Maurice Kirk, the Flying Vet, was himself subjected to crazy legal decisions whilst living in the Channel Islands. He decided to move to Wales: http://kirkflyingvet.com/ What an exciting guy! What fascinating adventures! He was initially unaware that the lawyers were FAKE, that they belonged to a GANG that uses the principle of REVERSAL. Evil is good. Innocent is guilty. Lies are true. Truth is lies. The Devil if god. You could not make it up. So those who declare the intelligent to be mad are THEMSELVES mad: http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Clem12/c15inemengl.htm They torture each other until they agree with this mad "philosophy". After all, friendship is enmity (or is it)? These nutters pursued the Flying Vet for years, rigging accusations against him. On this latest occasion, he bought a plane with a non- functioning REPLICA of a Lewis Gun. It had NO TRIGGER. It was HARMLESS. This came from a film company. He is the Flying Vet. He wanted the plane, not the gun-ornament. So he sold the gun AS AN ORNAMENT. It was quite useless for anything else. But wrong is right (or is it)? Maurice Kirk was accused of owning and selling a WEAPON. The film company was not accused of such things, nor was the new owner. THIS CLEARLY SHOWS BIAS. So a vast mountain had been made out of a tiny molehill. He was thrown into prison, with bail denied. He was denied a public hearing. The "authorities" insisted on a VIDEO link. When he tried it, they threw the switch and cut him off. That is why they insist on a video link - deliberately to violate Article 6. Then they put him into the mental ward of a hospital. As Norman Scarth says, this is a STALINIST PRACTICE. Here is his address: Mr. Maurice Kirk MRCVS. Caswell Clinic, Glanrhyd Hospital, Tondu Road, BRIDGEND CF31 4LN Tel. No. for patients: 01656 753 142 Now they are planning to have him declared insane, and keep him in hospital FOREVER. Here is Norman's letter to the Ombudsman for Wales: ------------------------------------------------------------------ To The Public Service Ombudsman for Wales; Yesterday, 15th Oct. 2009 I posted to you authorisation from Mr. Maurice Kirk that I should act for him regarding his incarceration in Caswell Clinic. 1). So gross & so blatant are the violations of his human & legal rights, it is difficult to know where to start. Nobel Laureate Alekzandr Solzhenitsyn said, "To put a sane person in a madhouse (his word) is worse than the gas chambers. The torture is more cruel, death takes longer". 2). That State crime 'worse than the gas chambers' can occur in a country which purports to be a Democracy is beyond belief, but believe it you must. 3). Is Mr. Kirk 'normal'? 'Normal' people watch East-Enders, avidly read about 'celebrities', play the Lottery, & vociferously support 'Man United'. Mr. Kirk is a little different: He flies flimsy aircraft across vast oceans. When he sees what he perceives to be corruption or injustic, he tries to expose it. 4). Does that mean he is mentally ill? Hardly. Pity there are not more like him! In his efforts to expose corruption he has upset some very powerful people. 5). He currently has pending court actions, criminal & civil, against South Wales Police. These matters should be decided in a court of law. 6). It is true that some people do take frivolous & vexatious court actions against innocent people & organisations. When such people persist, the usual course of action is to have them legally declared to be 'VEXATIOUS LITIGANTS', when they must ask permission of a judge before taking action. 7). Is Mr. Kirk such a person? If his court actions were to proceed, we would find out. However, his opponents do not want the actions to proceed. 8). So, in collusion with other powerful people, they decide to label him as 'mentally ill', & incarcerate him in what is called a 'hospital', but is in fact a prison, without any end to the 'sentence' in site, & the constant fear that 'the liquid cosh' might be used at any time. That fear is itself enough to affect the mind of a person was sane when admitted.. 9). It would be almost impossible for him to prepare & present his court cases from in such a place, but it is made completely impossible by denying him the 'equality of arms' to which he is entitled under British Law & the European Convention on Human Rights. 10). In 1860, the eminent Lord Chief Justice Cockburn said, "The courts of England are open to all, in every sense of the words, & I trust they will always remain so". In the early part of the 20th century, Lord Justice Lawrence (later to preside at Nuremberg) said much the same. 11). Sadly, in the 21st century they are not open to Maurice Kirk, & whistle-blowers like him. It is not 'sad', but tragic that all those who bravely gave their lives in World war II died in vain. 12). EVERYTHING we fought against then is here now in Britain, but better hidden. Added to which we have the Stalinist practice of putting sane 'dissidents' in 'hospitals'. There is much more that can be said, & much evidence produced, but I trust you have read enough to realise that this is a very important matter. Important for Maurice Kirk, yes, but also of great importance to Democracy & the Rule of Law. There are those who claim that we have Magna Carta, Habeas Corpus & the 1689 Bill of Rights. In theory, yes, in practice we have none of them. It will take a person of great courage to take this up. I hope you are that person. Sincerely, Norman Scarth. --------------------------------------------------------- The Flying Vet has been on hunger strike for a very long time. He desperately needs whatever help the public can give. Please protest to the authorities. To the courts of Wales, to the hospital, to the ombudsman, to your own MP and the MPs for Wales, to the Welsh Town Councillors. Let us get a protest really moving. Charles Douglas Wehner[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
