Skeptical Digest 21.3 (Autumn 2008)
Von: The Skeptic (UK) Digest (digest@skeptic.org.uk) [Profil]
Datum: 08.02.2009 18:38
Message-ID: <1MEjl.22050$536.600@newsfe04.ams2>
Newsgroup: uk.mediasci.skeptic
Datum: 08.02.2009 18:38
Message-ID: <1MEjl.22050$536.600@newsfe04.ams2>
Newsgroup: uk.mediasci.skeptic
CONTENTS Dubious News - In this Issue - Little Atoms Podcast - Events - Administrivia Reagan, Clinton, Bush, Plait In recent times, the qualifications required for US politicians and political candidates have notoriously come under question. Certainly, with airtime given to Barack Obama's breakfast preferences and whether those expensive Italian shoes really make John McCain any less 'American', popular political discussion seems to be increasingly vacuous. There is little doubt, however, that a certain newly elected President is actually very well suited to his new role, despite a penchant for t-shirts and baseball caps. At least one online (admittedly spoof) news portal declared the "Phil Plait Phenomenon" in full swing, and it only seems fitting to recognise the latest appointment to the ranks of the James Randi Educational Foundation (JREF). Since JREF's foundation in 1994, James Randi has been at its helm in the role of President, figurehead, and general sceptical icon. The JREF press release issued on the 4th August, however, marked an end to this reign and a movement "up-and-sideways" for Randi, to the position of "Founder and Chairman of the Board". Meanwhile, Phil Plait adopts the vacated presidential position. Plait (a familiar name to many sceptics) runs the website Bad Astronomy, founded the blog of the same title in 2005, and recently rose to interstellar notoriety with an asteroid bearing his name. Randi stated that the changes to the JREF structure would provide "the time and opportunity to finish my next two books: A Magician in the Laboratory, and Wrong!", though in the edition of SWIFT on March 19th 2004, he wrote: "I lose no opportunity to get to my keyboard and record my thoughts before the inevitability of time catches up with me. I estimate that I have two more books in me. Perhaps quantity will substitute for scholarship". Thankfully, with these latest offerings following a publication in 2005, that estimate is already Wrong! and I hope this paves the way for many further publications from Randi's hand. Denver, the most inviting place on Earth We now know that aliens not only exist, but are also exempt from criminal prosecution in America, or at least those are the implications of an article in the Denver Post. The reported story rests on an alleged alien visitation to Denver, in which a stereotypically grey, inverted pear-shape head, appeared at the window of a man who coincidentally happened to have a video camera pointing in the same direction with the belief that local deviants had been peering into his house at his young daughters. Obviously it is easy to mistake a pervert for an alien, but the resulting worldwide attention given to the videotape goes to show precisely how frenzied the media can become when armed with a poorly taken video, an endorsement of authenticity, and a healthy imagination. Validated by a film editor also from Denver, a reconstruction of the videotape was looped over and over on news channels while its owner, Stan Romanek, described his thoughts of the images. Details of the preliminary investigation and precisely how the tape was proven to be authentic are seemingly unreleased, but more interesting hoaxes have been uncovered in the past. The Cottingley Fairies, for instance, started life in 1917, long before international media. They were a private joke between relatives but photos were soon endorsed and validated by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and Harold Snelling (an expert in 20th century fake photography) rendering them as a unique mystery. After debate lasting for 64 years, four of the five photos were eventually revealed as fakes through a confession from their creators. They were made using paper cut-outs and hatpins, though the authenticity of the fifth photo was always maintained. In the Denver case, however, the story becomes wonderfully farcical with Romanek's claim that he has encountered aliens on over 100 other occasions. To keep allegedly authentic video evidence of an extraterrestrial visitation hidden for years is implausible for so many reasons, but to remain silent about countless other incidents including abductions and torture, suggests a completely different motivation than the promotion of public awareness, especially when the incidents are later revealed to the media. A news conference was organised for Romanek and the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON) by Jeff Packman, a local resident. Around 30 journalists attended with at least 12 further TV cameras present. At the conference, Packman suggested that the city develop an Extraterrestrial Affairs Commission that would handle alien encounters. What seems evident from the Denver case, the Cottingley Fairies, and countless other examples, is the impressively low threshold of evidence required for a vaguely inventive hoax to gain international awareness and become part of our culture. The perpetuation of poorly supported claims in the face of common sense and fundamental questioning paves the way for future dubious thought. One thing is certain: if aliens genuinely were peering into Denver homes, no prosecutions would be brought for breach of privacy or trespassing. Their existence would become a worldwide news story and justifiably so. Rather than media sensationalism and willing liberal acceptance as a default position, what is perhaps required is a little reflection on the nature of claims and the suspension of belief until the discovery of robust evidence. The end of the world is pretty With this issue of Hits and Misses taking a decidedly extraterrestrial turn, it seems an appropriate time to mention developments with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the Conseil Europ?en pour la Recherche Nucl?aire (CERN). Crudely explained, the LHC is a ring of evacuated piping, buried 100 metres under the Franco-Swiss border and surrounded by 9300 powerful, superconducting magnets, forming the world's largest cryogenic facility. Inside the 'beam pipes', protons are accelerated to speeds approaching that of light, travelling 11,245 times around the 26.6 km ring every second before intentional collisions between the particles are created. The energy and particles created as a result of the collisions are under study in an attempt to better understand high energy events and interactions. Presuming the current tentative schedule is met, the LHC is due to begin testing and collecting data this September. It will be six to seven years, however, before any results can be analysed. The reason for this is that the particle events under investigation will only occur in a minority of the interactions and, even then, their presence will be masked by 'noise' generated from other interactions. The events are also very short-lived, lasting only for fractions of a second. As a result, data of sufficient statistical power will take the best part of a decade to collect. At its core, it is hoped that the data from the LHC will support the existence of the Higgs boson, the only particle identified within the most accurate theoretical physical model (Standard Model) which has not yet been observed. Consequently, without the Higgs boson, our current understanding of physics would need revising. Throughout the development of the LHC, controversy has existed about its safety, not least due to the fact that it is the most powerful particle accelerator ever developed. While physicists would likely consider the annihilation of Earth to be resounding proof of their hypotheses, such an event, though unlikely, would inevitably cause difficulties disseminating results in a peer-reviewed format. Trips to the CERN complex can be booked at its website, through which a frightening array of quite colourful equipment can be seen, so if nothing else, the end of the world is pretty. Little Atoms The Skeptic now has an official podcast; Little Atoms is "a show about ideas", and its hosts, Neil Denny, Padraig Reidy, and Anthony Burn, converse weekly with a guest about "freedom of expression, free inquiry, empirical rationalism, skepticism, the scientific method, secular humanism and liberal democracy". With past guests such as Christopher Hitchens, Jon Ronson, and James Randi, you can be guaranteed there is never a dull moment on-air! The Little Atoms podcasts can be accessed via our website and also on iTunes. The Skeptic Vol 21, No 3 Autumn 2008 Features: Making UFOlogy History David Clarke reviews three books on classic UFO cases published 60 years after the birth of UFOlogy The recovered memory debate: False memories of the memory literature? James Ost analyzes and critiques a body of false memory literature Profits of the New Age Jon Cohen reports on a sceptical day spent at The Mystic Arts Exhibition, 2008 Humour: Sprite, by Donald Rooum Cartoons by Tim Pearce Pictures from Hilary Evans' Paranormal Picture Gallery Skeptical Stats: A column based on the observation that sometimes statistics don't lie - they're just plain crazy... Hits and Misses: Reagan, Clinton, Bush, Plait Denver, the most inviting place on Earth The end of the world is pretty Little Atoms Columns: Editorial (Lindsay Kallis and Chris French) Skeptic at Large (Wendy M. Grossman) Philosopher's Corner (Julian Baggini) Sprite (Donald Rooum) Through a Glass Darkly (Michael Heap) Reviews: Science and Religions: A Very Short Introducion by Thomas Dixon The Satanic Scriptures by Peter H. Gilmore In God We Doubt: Confessions of a Failed Atheist by John Humphrys How to Be a Good Atheist by Nick Harding Events: A complete list of upcoming events at Skeptics in the Pub in the UK, at the Center for Inquiry, London (http://cfilondon.org) and at the Anomalistic Psychology Research Unit at Goldsmiths (http://www.goldsmiths.ac.uk/apru/lectures) are at http://skeptic.org.uk/events Skeptical Digest is written by Mark Williams and e-mailed quarterly alongside published issues of The Skeptic; there may be occasional additional mailings. To subscribe to or leave the digest, visit http://skeptic.org.uk/mail/mail.cgi/list/digest (we do not sell, give away, or rent the e-mailing list).[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
