• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Unite the Whites

"Jani" <jani@jani.adsl24.co.uk> wrote in message
news:foicmn$25p0$1@energise.enta.net...
>
> "Meldon" <meldon@meldon.com> wrote in message
> news:13qoh284961754a@corp.supernews.com...
>
> []
>
>> One such example is an Act in Canada called Employment Equity. Its a bit
>> scary really. The site is loaded with such phrases such as "Racism-Free
>> Workplace" but when examined, the legislation does not include white
>> anglo
>> males. Here are the groups that are protected from discrimination.
>>
>>  a.. aboriginal people
>>  b.. persons with disabilities
>>  c.. members of a visible minority
>>  d.. women
>> http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/labour/employee_rights/index.shtml
>>
>> Unless I'm completely stupid, please point out to me where white, anglo
>> males are protected.
>
> If they're a visible minority, they're in category c. If they're a
> majority, why do they need protection?
>
> Jani
>
>

Clearly they are not a visible minority as defined in the statutes so they
must be part of a majority. Members of a majority can experience
discrimination also and therefore should be entitled to protection from
discrimination.

Members of a majority are not free from experiencing discrimination just
because they belong to a majority are they?.

Do you think a majority should receive protection from racial and ethnic
discrimination or not and if so why?

Antworten