nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: A Pro-White Agenda

Von: David Johnston (david@block.net) [Profil]
Datum: 11.02.2008 08:38
Message-ID: <5ouvq3t2iq8cqarnvp84p58qml8dr9l965@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.religion.christian.baptist uk.mediasoc.men can.politics alt.politics.bush alt.culture 
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 02:30:58 -0500, "Meldon" <meldon@meldon.com>
wrote:

>
>"David Johnston" <david@block.net> wrote in message
>news:9grvq3pp6ci202eh8mq5lmig1om8o6bjsm@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 01:12:11 -0500, "Meldon"
<meldon@meldon.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> You still haven't answered the question.  What does "hire white,
>>>> promote white" mean?
>>>>
>>>
>>>It means to hire white and promote white.
>>
>> As opposed to what alternative?
>
>The alternatives are not my immediate concern and have nothing to do with
>this thread but feel free to begin a new one which examines them.

I see no reason to.  Is there some reason why you avoid explaining
what you mean?

>
>>>>>"achieve equality in the workplace so that no person shall be
denied
>>>>>employment opportunities or benefits for reasons unrelated to
ability
>>>>>and,
>>>>>in the fulfillment of the goals, to correct the conditions of
>>>>>disadvantage
>>>>>in employment experienced by women, Aboriginal peoples, persons with
>>>>>disabilities, and visible minority people by giving effect to the
>>>>>principle
>>>>>that employment equity means more than treating persons in the same
way
>>>>>but
>>>>>also requires special measures and the accommodation of
differences."
>>>>
>>>> So where are poor English language skills mentioned?
>>>
>>>It's not.
>>
>> Then that isn't especially relevant now is it?
>
>English language skills are irrelevant??

I can see why you'd think so.  After all, you religiously avoid making
any clear statements.
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten