• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Banks win Supreme Court case on overdraft charges

Col Colt wrote:

> "Adrian" <toomany2cvs@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:7n7e6mF3jncedU7@mid.individual.net...  >"Col Colt"
> <colcolt@hotmail.com> gurgled happily, sounding much like they
> > were saying:
> >
> > > If I sue my bank for breach of contract, then bank will expect
> > > me to demonstrate that the amount I claim is commensurate with
> > > my losses.  I expect the same behaviour from the bank; which
> > > means bank charges that reflect the cost to the bank.
> >
> > You seem to forget one small detail.
> >
> > You've agreed to the charges that the bank will impose, in
> > advance.  They're clearly specified in the terms and conditions
> > of the account, and you are deemed to agree to those Ts&Cs by
> > operating the account.
> >
> Irrelevant.  T&Cs do not override the principles of civil law.

Thats the whole argument do the terms actually break the law or not

Antworten