Protection from abuse in customer facing positions
Von: ruzzyrat (ruzzyrat@googlemail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 06.11.2009 23:50
Message-ID: <98aea2ac-1d8a-4e1d-8f6c-0dd2bbe81e3a@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: uk.legal
Datum: 06.11.2009 23:50
Message-ID: <98aea2ac-1d8a-4e1d-8f6c-0dd2bbe81e3a@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: uk.legal
I work in a call centre, I would like some advice on some new policies the company has brought in. 1. Something that has always been a grey area was at what point abusive customers could be cut off, ie. how abusive do they need to be, how many times do they need to swear before it's unacceptable? Today the company cleared that up in a recent memo: Under no circumstances. That means no matter how abusive, presumably including racial abuse and threats of violence, cutting the call would be classed as misconduct. I know that companies have a duty to protect employees from abuse and harassment, but surely that applies to abuse from customers, not just other employees? 2. The second part of the same policy was about our full name. Previously giving our name out was our own choice, I consider my full name to be private and I prefer not to give it out. Especially as the electoral register can be used to find a full address from a name and a rough location. The new policy on this is that we must give out our full name if asked for by a customer. In addition to this we must give the full name of other employees that have spoken or will speak to the customer. Surely giving out the names of other employees without their permission is a breach of the DPA?[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Colin Wilson (07.11.2009 00:36)
- ruzzyrat (07.11.2009 17:31)
- ruzzyrat (07.11.2009 17:35)
- Gary Baldi (07.11.2009 18:44)
- peterwn (07.11.2009 08:25)
- Graham Murray (07.11.2009 09:17)
- Joseph Hill (07.11.2009 10:31)
- Tony Dragon (07.11.2009 10:43)
- Steve Walker (07.11.2009 13:08)
