• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Dodgy Picture? [continued from ULM]

In message
<af5222bc-e253-4166-8e9c-5eec884ffb3b@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>, at
01:18:50 on Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Nigel Oldfield
<wmcriticalestoppel@googlemail.com> remarked:
>[I don't know. Frankly I'm fed up with spinning wheels discussing type
>1
>& 2, when the real harm is with types 3+. ]
>
>(1) what harm?

The harm caused by people inflicting themselves upon the children, and
photographing the activity.

>(2) pretending there is some, where is your evidence that the
>sentencing guideline levels are any distinguisher of relative harm?

The levels describe increasingly extreme activity. It seems fair to
assume that the harm increases too.

>Who has claimed they are?

"are what"? As a general answer to most possible interpretations of that
question, I'll say: professionals working in this area.
--
Roland Perry

Antworten