nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: Yet another ethnic plod with a chip on their shoulder

Von: JNugent (jn@noparticularplacetogo.com) [Profil]
Datum: 06.11.2009 00:47
Message-ID: <0qqdnVoDDrdh_m7XnZ2dnUVZ7oVi4p2d@pipex.net>
Newsgroup: uk.politics.misc uk.legal
Cynic wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:17:10 +0000, JNugent
> <JN@noparticularplacetogo.com> wrote:
>
>> "Legally not guilty" is merely a different way of saying that the
jury think
>> they didn't do it (ie, that they were factually not guilty).
>
> No, it really doesn't mean that at all.
>
> A jury may well believe that the defendent probably is guilty, yet
> still deliver a verdict of "not guilty" because they are not *certain
> beyond reasonable doubt* of his guilt.

You are assuming that. You cannot know it.

All you can know is that they don't think he did it (maybe by a majority).

[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten