• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Britain's Establishment precludes any implementation of a written constitution

Yes, a written constitution for Britain would be fantastic, but it
will never happen all the while the Establishment runs Britain.
Britain's Establishment is older by far than most of us can even begin
to comprehend. It can be traced back way beyond the industrial
revolution, before the French Revolution, before the War of
Independence, long before any of those events. Britain's Establishment
is so entrenched, it is part of the British psyche, like blood and
honour.

A written constitution would mean throwing the Establishment
overboard. We could not have one AND the other, therefore the
Establishment would have to go. This is not going to happen without a
civil revolution of our own, except that it wouldn't be very civil.
Not only our system of government would have to be changed in every
respect - parliament, first-past-the-post, unelected upper chamber,
adversarial confrontation - but our justice system would have to be
scrapped entirely and replaced with a fundamentally new approach to
match the new constitution. British society, the very essence of
Britain and Britishness, would have to expose itself to such radical
change that Britain would become an entirely different nation, as if a
foreign enemy had invaded and taken over.

It will, therefore, never happen and we will continue to become more
and more like Ruritania.

MM

Antworten