• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Gagging The Guardian

Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:6fc1d16b1a917a486d9129361846baa5@dizum.com...
> According to the Guardian, despite the 1688 Bill of Rights, it has been
gagged from reporting a question to be asked in parliament later this week.
The gag was obtained by Carter-Ruck.  Wonder if it is this question:
>
> Paul Farrelly (Newcastle-under-Lyme): To ask the Secretary of State for
Justice, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of legislation to
protect (a) whistleblowers and (b) press freedom following the injunctions
obtained in the High Court by (i) Barclays and Freshfields solicitors on 19
March 2009 on the publication of internal Barclays reports documenting
alleged tax avoidance schemes and (ii) Trafigura and Carter-Ruck solicitors
on 11 September 2009 on the publication of the Minton report on the alleged
dumping of toxic waste in the Ivory Coast, commissioned by Trafigura.
>


My next parliamentary written question, in the pipeline,
will not be reported in the Grauniad either,
nor will the HO answer, whatever waffle that may take.

ps
What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing.chat.ru/dnapr.htm
or as flakey
http://www.nutteing.boom.ru/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.