Re: uk.legal.moderators
Von: Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script ) (nutteing@quickfindit.com) [Profil]
Datum: 11.10.2009 09:41
Message-ID: <7jdgdhF35f17tU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroup: uk.legal uk.net.news.moderation
Datum: 11.10.2009 09:41
Message-ID: <7jdgdhF35f17tU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroup: uk.legal uk.net.news.moderation
Paul C. Dickie <pcd@bozzie.demon.co.uk> wrote in message news:0sMaPeP+qR0KFwmX@bozzie.demon.co.uk... > In message <99t1d51etd0rtldc556kg0hmjhlt19t70n@4ax.com>, Judith M Smith > <judithmsmith@live.co.uk> writes > > >I seriously believe that *you* have been less than impartial > > Do you not consider that "less than impartial" is a rather curious > expression? > > For someone to be "impartial" means that they have zero partiality to > one side of an argument, so "less than impartial" must mean that they > have less than zero partiality to one or either side; this seems to be > quite meaningless. > > -- > < Paul > Only in a linear continuum. Now if you consider it as a circular continuum, like politics. Where the extreme right is almost indistinguishable from the extreme left, eg stalinism and nazism. ps What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles and what Special Branch don't want you to know. http://www.nutteing.boom.ru/dnapr.htm or nutteingd in a search engine.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Judith M Smith (11.10.2009 21:22)
