Re: Petting Zoos

The Todal <deadmailbox@beeb.net> wrote in message
news:7hrsi9F2ruau8U1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "Cynic" <cynic_999@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:u4ehb5pmsg8tknkh1t1t0blg33pqmcfbh2@4ax.com...
> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 21:52:19 +0100, Alex Heney <me8@privacy.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>>Which, of course, the animals are NOT for the most part. The children
> >>>do not stroke around their nether regions, but stick to the back, the
> >>>neck, the ears and so on. Probably what happened in all or most cases
> >>>was the child cannot read the warnings signs and the parent(s) have
> >>>never inculcated basic hygiene of hand-washing before meals, so the
> >>>kids stroke a baa-baa and then go off and eat chips with their
> >>>fingers.
> >>
> >>They now apparently think that the main outbreak (Godstone Farm)
> >>started from the sandpit, rather than from the animals.
> >
> > In that case it sounds as if sand is too dangerous to allow children
> > to play in.  Probably best to keep them safe at home with a few DVDs
> > and video games - so long as you don't allow them out into the garden,
> > where they may become infected by dog or cat faeces.  In fact, all
> > sensible parents will either live in a high-rise, or will have
> > concreted over every square inch of dirt in their garden.
>
> Very sensible advice.
>
> Another good bit of advice is that if you are worried about exposing your
> child to danger (perhaps from a farm which has already infected other
> children with life-threatening bacteria, perhaps from a funfair where a
> couple of the mechanical rides have collapsed, injuring the children,
> perhaps from a canoeing centre where a child has drowned and one of the
> staff has been suspended pending a possible prosecution for health and
> safety offences) you should simply distance yourself from the problem.
Tell
> yourself that all tragedies are truly random. You are in the hands of an
> ever-merciful God, who will protect those who honour His name. Whatever
will
> be, will be.
>
> We could learn a lot from the Victorians. They all had huge numbers of
kids
> in a family and took it for granted that about a third would die before
> adulthood. Those who survived childhood were all the stronger for it. We
owe
> it to posterity to encourage the survival of the fittest and luckiest.
>



But there is also the opposite effect,
http://media-newswire.com/release_1099275.html
epigenetics. The effects of starvation/poverty
can get propogated genetically

ps
What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing.chat.ru/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]