Re: Anger over Mail column on Gately
Von: Jon Ribbens (jon+usenet@unequivocal.co.uk) [Profil]
Datum: 20.10.2009 12:54
Message-ID: <slrnhdr5n9.l6u.jon+usenet@snowy.squish.net>
Newsgroup: uk.gay-lesbian-bi
Datum: 20.10.2009 12:54
Message-ID: <slrnhdr5n9.l6u.jon+usenet@snowy.squish.net>
Newsgroup: uk.gay-lesbian-bi
On 2009-10-20, Ttoommy <GIN@barmouthl.co.uk> wrote: > Just making the point that IF the couple had been straight there every paper > would be "doing a daily mail" I don't think that's in the slightest bit true. > Anyway whilst there have been 21,000 complaints whatever happened to free > speeech - It should be extended to people who disagree with your POV innit > does anyone believe that threatning Jan Moir helps anyone? I certainly don't think Jan Moir should be prevented *by the law* from writing her crap. That doesn't mean everyone has to sit passively by without complaint while the Daily Mail publishes it. They get their free speech, and we get ours to say we think their opinion is a steaming pile of shit. I do think it is a problem in general though - there ought to be something more to prevent the newspapers routinely printing total lies about whoever and whatever they want. There ought to be *some* sort of responsibility to be vaguely in the neighbourhood of the truth.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Stephen M Baines (20.10.2009 15:23)
- Lyn (20.10.2009 19:04)
- Stephen M Baines (21.10.2009 08:43)
- freddy fox (21.10.2009 19:31)
- Jon Ribbens (22.10.2009 01:51)
- Greg (23.10.2009 00:12)
- Stephen M Baines (23.10.2009 11:23)
