Gov. Green Paper: Responsibility and democratic rights
Von: I&R ~ GB (info@example.com) [Profil]
Datum: 20.04.2009 17:39
Message-ID: <753j3qF16a1vdU1@mid.uni-berlin.de>
Newsgroup: alt.politics.media alt.politics.british uk.environment uk.politics.parliamentscot.politics uk.politics.misc uk.politics.constitution
Datum: 20.04.2009 17:39
Message-ID: <753j3qF16a1vdU1@mid.uni-berlin.de>
Newsgroup: alt.politics.media alt.politics.british uk.environment uk.politics.parliamentscot.politics uk.politics.misc uk.politics.constitution
Responsibility and democratic rights: Gov. Green Paper Here is our first comment on the latest discussion paper of the Ministry of Justice, Green Paper 2009 Rights and responsibilities: developing our constitutional framework (see contents below) http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/docs/rights-responsibilities.pdf ================================================ COMMENT 7 April 2009 at 5:41 pm I want to ask the green paper’s authors why they have omitted to consider improvements of our democratic rights, a major area of responsible citizen-action in which an urgent overhaul is needed. I refer here to improving democracy in the UK, countries and locally, by adding to our “political rights” for instance “the right to participate in the exercise of political power” (Marshall, cited in the green paper). A respected observer and establishment insider not long ago referred to the UK as an elective dictatorship and in league tables of political participation Britain scores poorly. So called political apathy and low election turnout result in part from these deficits. You write “The challenge is how best to remind people of the importance of individual responsibility and to give this greater prominence.” It would be hard to imagine a better way to express personal civic responsibility than by taking part in running our own public affairs. Such expression however is hindered by a fundamental flaw in our indirect, “representative” democracy which is that a single vote cast once every four or five years gives us, the electorate, very little say in public policy. By introducing elements of direct, citizen-led democracy, we could enable the electorate to decide on selected issues and (by calling a referendum) veto unwanted law passed by local council or central government. =============================================== The above comment from I&R ~ GB has been posted to the government's web site, see http://governance.justice.gov.uk/join-the-debate/ Section: Approaches to a Bill of Rights and Responsibilities --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rights and responsibilities: developing our constitutional framework Contents Foreword 3 Executive Summary 8 Chapter 1 Bills of Rights – seeking stability in times of uncertainty 11 Chapter 2 Responsibilities 14 The case for change 17 Criminal Justice 19 Education and the family 20 Examples in international and national instruments 22 Chapter 3 Rights 29 Criminal justice 32 Equality 37 Good administration 39 Social justice and the welfare state 41 Healthcare 44 Children 46 Living within environmental limits 48 Chapter 4 Legal Effect 51 Enforceability – a range of options 52 Decision-making and resource allocation: the role of the courts 57 Relation of a Bill of Rights and Responsibilities to other legislation 58 A Bill of Rights and Responsibilities and devolution 58 Chapter 5 Next Steps 62 ----------------------------------- I&R ~ GB Citizens' Initiative and Referendum Campaign for direct democracy in Britain http://www.iniref.org/ http://www.ipetitions.com/campaigns/i-and-r.gb sign up for reform[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
