After the Irish "No": Democracy in UK
Von: I&R ~ GB (info@sistrix.com) [Profil]
Datum: 18.06.2008 18:37
Message-ID: <6bsrqhF3cfkckU1@mid.uni-berlin.de>
Newsgroup: alt.politics.media alt.politics.british uk.environment uk.politics.parliamentscot.politics uk.politics.misc uk.politics.constitution
Datum: 18.06.2008 18:37
Message-ID: <6bsrqhF3cfkckU1@mid.uni-berlin.de>
Newsgroup: alt.politics.media alt.politics.british uk.environment uk.politics.parliamentscot.politics uk.politics.misc uk.politics.constitution
============================================================== IR+R NEWS - news about democratic reform, citizens' initiative, referendum, recall of elected officials. A service of Citizens' Initiative and Referendum I&R ~ GB ============================================================== AFTER THE IRISH "NO": REFLECTION ON DEMOCRACY IN THE UK June 2008 Claim right of citizens to propose and obtain a referendum Political parties in Britain fish for votes by using the promise of a referendum as bait. Recent experience on several important themes -- the electoral system, the Euro currency and worst of all the constitutional treaty for Europe* -- has shown that such promises were unreliable or worthless. We are told by politicians that a referendum cannot be held unless the government of the day "allows" one. An Act of the usually obedient parliament is required to rubber-stamp a wish of the prime minister to hold a referendum. There are better ways to govern our own public affairs. There is no good reason to do things in this centralised and dictatorial manner. The Irish example in 2008, similar in Denmark 2005, show that this must *not* be the case. The electorate must take back their power to decide on certain important issues which they select. How can this be done? We must simply introduce the right of citizens to propose and force a referendum, by collecting a large number of endorsements for a proposal. Using this method, which is used in a number of countries similar to ours, we can propose or change a law and formulate a directive to our representatives in the European Union. Also, we can put up for veto (by referendum) a government bill, a new international treaty or proposed change in constitution. See also the posting below "MPs reject EU treaty referendum" ================================== *The Labour Party manifesto 2005 stated: "The EU now has 25 members and will continue to expand. The new Constitutional Treaty ensures the new Europe can work effectively, and that Britain keeps control of key national interests like foreign policy, taxation, social security and defence. The Treaty sets out what the EU can do and what it cannot. It strengthens the voice of national parliaments and governments in EU affairs. It is a good treaty for Britain and for the new Europe. We will put it to the British people in a referendum and campaign whole-heartedly for a ‘Yes’ vote to keep Britain a leading nation in Europe." MPs REJECT EU TREATY REFERENDUM bbc.com 5.3.2008 "MPs reject EU treaty referendum The government says a referendum is not needed on the treaty MPs have rejected proposals to hold a UK-wide referendum on whether to ratify the EU's Lisbon Treaty. The House of Commons turned down the Conservative proposal by 311 votes to 248 - a margin of 63. The result means Parliament itself will decide whether to ratify the treaty, signed by EU leaders last December." <snip> Above items appear at *INIREF BLOG <http://www.iniref.org/blog.html>* ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- About I&R ~ GB We advocate the introduction of direct democratic procedures such as citizens' initiative, issue-ballot, referendum, and recall in the countries of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. With over ten years' experience we put forward proposals, provide campaign resources, offer to provide speakers, organise workshops and conferences. Web site: http://www.iniref.org Contact: info AT iniref.org[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Michael Laudahn eOpposition (18.06.2008 18:49)
