Are SATA drives less resilient to file-system corruption than IDE?
Von: Mortimer (me@privacy.net) [Profil]
Datum: 07.07.2008 14:21
Message-ID: <mZqdncVpWMbZl-_VnZ2dnUVZ8uqdnZ2d@posted.plusnet>
Newsgroup: uk.comp.misc
Datum: 07.07.2008 14:21
Message-ID: <mZqdncVpWMbZl-_VnZ2dnUVZ8uqdnZ2d@posted.plusnet>
Newsgroup: uk.comp.misc
Over the past couple of months I've been called to three customers whose PCs have failed to boot. When I put the HDD in a second computer, Windows CHDSKs it, corrects a few filesystem errors and leaves the disk in a state where it will boot the original PC perfectly. In all three cases, the PCs have had SATA drives. I've never seen this symptom with IDE disks. Is there something about SATA drives which makes them more vulnerable to filesystem corruption than IDE ones, assuming the same filesystem (NTFS) and OS (XP) in both cases? When I asked the owners about events that led up to the problems, the common factor is a mains blip or power-cut: in one case something fell on the mains lead and connector and may have interrupted the mains for an instant; in another case it transpired that the house had an over-sensitive RCD which "is always tripping-out when I turn the garage light on"![ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Chris Whelan (07.07.2008 15:01)
