organic and vaccination
Von: Jane Gillett (j.gillett@higherstert.co.uk) [Profil]
Datum: 17.08.2008 12:52
Message-ID: <4fd03a92a7j.gillett@higherstert.co.uk>
Newsgroup: uk.business.agriculture
Datum: 17.08.2008 12:52
Message-ID: <4fd03a92a7j.gillett@higherstert.co.uk>
Newsgroup: uk.business.agriculture
Just seen on Country File where a farmer vaccinating cattle for Blue Tongue was explaining that although they were organic - or "nearly organic" whstever that means, possibly in conversion, - she needed a derogation (sp) from the Soil Assoc to do the vaccination. Why? Animals do not become non-organic if they have a disease and get over it by their own resistance so why should artificial introduction of the disease - not articial <cure> be any different? I think the SA hasn't got its act together on this one. Years ago when we were considering becoming organic the local SA people told us that vaccination was not allowed but the SA central management said that it was if there was a likelyhood (local, if appropriate) of getting the disease. AIUI it was not a "derogation". There is a likelyhood throughout UK for Blue Tongue so why should derogation, as in "special permission", be needed. And, above all that, why is it considered any different from getting the disease "naturally"? The SA attitude to vaccination - the attitude as portrayed by the difference between central and local opinions - was one of the reasons why we decided not to bother with organic. There was no way I was going to subject my lambs to suffer and die unnecessarily of pasteurella which is common in our local climate and I was not prepared to bother with any argument with the local SA about vaccination even if I was certain to win it on a call to their central organisation. Cheers Jane -- Jane G : j.gillett@higherstert.co.uk : S Devon[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- greymaus (17.08.2008 16:28)
