Re: EU may delay decision in May on growing GM crops
Von: Old Codger (oldcodger@anyoldwherewilldo.com) [Profil]
Datum: 25.04.2008 09:46
Message-ID: <cu2314p92hjbdn3h217270fakhl53il9bh@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: uk.business.agriculture uk.rec.gardening uk.rec.birdwatching uk.environment.conservationtalk.politics.animals alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian uk.environment uk.environment.conservation
Datum: 25.04.2008 09:46
Message-ID: <cu2314p92hjbdn3h217270fakhl53il9bh@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: uk.business.agriculture uk.rec.gardening uk.rec.birdwatching uk.environment.conservationtalk.politics.animals alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian uk.environment uk.environment.conservation
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 08:20:28 +0100, Old Codger <oldcodger@anyoldwherewilldo.com> wrote: >EU may delay decision in May on growing GM crops >Mon Apr 21, 2008 7:45pm BST >By Jeremy Smith >http://tinyurl.com/6odz3w >BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Commission may again put off a >decision on whether farmers can grow more genetically modified crops >when it holds a long-awaited biotech policy debate in May, officials >said on Monday. > >After months of expectation, the Commission has finally set May 7 for >debating its biotech policy, centered around what has been called the >"Dimas package": EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas, one of the >most GMO-wary commissioners. > >Cultivation of GM crops is expected to be at the top of the agenda, >with three applications long overdue for consideration, one lawsuit >filed against the Commission and another threatened. > >The EU has not approved any GM crops for growing since 1998. > >Another big problem is Austria, the only remaining country cited in a >World Trade Organisation case filed against the Commission by >Argentina, Canada and the United States to maintain bans, from 1997 >and 1999, against two GM crop products. > >Officials said one possible deal being discussed in Brussels was for >Dimas to agree to an order for Austria to lift its ban on import and >processing of those products, but keep its ban on cultivation. In >return, his wish to reject two company applications for growing GM >crops would not be blocked. > >"The idea would be for Dimas to give this and allow the College (the >EU's 27 commissioners) to decide on the two maizes," one EU official >said. > >"(It) would have to go against the proposal of a commissioner (to >block the GM maize applications). Several member states have also come >out explicitly against (GM crop) cultivation," the official said. > >Those maizes are Syngenta's Bt-11; and 1507 maize, developed by >Pioneer Hi-Bred International, a unit of DuPont Co, and Dow >AgroSciences unit Mycogen Seeds. > >Last year, Pioneer filed a lawsuit against the Commission for what it >called undue delays in processing its request for EU approval of 1507 >maize. And last week, German chemicals company BASF threatened to do >the same over its biotech potato, which it wants EU farmers to grow to >make extra starch. > >For months, the Commission has been due to debate the issue in a bid >to end a policy vacuum and also show its major trading partners like >the United States, the world's top biotech crop grower, that Europe >is, to a point, in the market for GMOs. > >Europe has long been split on biotech policy and the EU's 27 countries >consistently clash over whether to approve new, finished GM varieties >for import. The Commission usually ends up issuing a rubberstamp >approval, which it may do under EU law. > >(Editing by Peter Blackburn) > You may wonder why the dodgy farmers and other idiots are so keen to push GM regardless of risk to the planet! Well it's cost and cost alone. GM/Frankenstein crops equal cheap feed for their factory farmed, long suffering livestock and from there it gets in to the human food chain. You don't imagine farmers eat this crap themselves do you?[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
